ioparchitect.blogg.se

Online 2017 film tulip fever
Online 2017 film tulip fever










online 2017 film tulip fever

Make Jan a charmer who makes Sophia feel valued and desired. It's not like much would have been required.

online 2017 film tulip fever

Online 2017 film tulip fever movie#

After a few painting sessions with Jan, apparently they're smitten with one another, though the movie never does the slightest work to establish a spark between them. It presents her frustrations and malaise with her husband, so being in a position for finding a passionate alternative and outlet is established. Firstly, the film never presents a suitable rationale for why Sophia would fall into bed with Jan. Tulip Fever is awash in strange and ineffective plotting. The servant woman, Maria (Holliday Grainger), is witness to her mistress' secrets, and as their affair continues, both parties devise an elaborate means that they can be together. The painter falls in love with his subject and he and Sophia begin having an affair. Cornelis, thinking about his legacy, hires a painter, Jan Van Loos (Dane DeHaan), for a portrait of he and Sophia. Meanwhile, Sophia (Vikander) is a young woman who is married off to Cornelis Sandvoort (Christoph Waltz), the self-described "king of peppercorn." The relationship lacks passion as their nightly sessions fail to deliver a child. The flowers are being traded and sold in the backs of taverns, and the tulip market seems limitless. Set in the early 1600s in Amsterdam, and the nation has gone wild for tulips.

online 2017 film tulip fever

It all smells less than rosy and more of desperation. It's not truly erotic, lacking a primal carnal power, and it's not really a thriller. It's being dumped into theaters over a tepid Labor Day release and the advertising is billing it as an "erotic thriller," which is a mistake on two fronts. A movie about tulips and love affairs seems like an odd choice, but hey, people got to see some extra Vikander nudity for free. The Weinstein Company even packaged a rare red band trailer for their movie, something more associated with ribald comedies and bloody action films. The studio seems quite hesitant about the finished product. The question arises why something seemingly so innocuous would take so long to release. In the time it took the studio to make and release Tulip Fever, Alicia Vikander filmed The Danish Girl, it was released, and she won an Oscar, and now she's going to portray Lara Croft in a new Tomb Raider franchise. Tulip Fever was originally filmed back in 2014 and has endured two years of delayed release dates. Perhaps I'm giving it too much credit, but I shudder to think that someone went through all of this trouble to make a movie that simplistically whimpers "babies are good, and flowers are pretty". Upon viewing this confusingly edited and poorly told story, I am truly baffled over what the filmmakers were trying to accomplish here. Even after seeing some of the most dense and surreal Bergman, Malle, and Wenders films, I had at least a tenuous grasp on what those films were doing. That is a gross misrepresentation of the "plot", if you can call it that. Most synopses you will find refer to a secret love affair between Dehaan and Vikander while they try to sell tulips or something. Regardless of the people involved, the story seems like it's trying to do too much while doing nothing at all. were hedging their bets that Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets would propel that not-so-dynamic duo on to the A list, and when that didn't work out they cut a bunch of their scenes. For some reason Dane Dehaan and Cara Delevigne are given some of the top billing despite the fact they get a relatively small amount screen time. They aren't really given characters to work with, and I think you can even see the dissatisfaction they have for their parts in certain scenes. Judi Dench, Christoph Waltz, and Alicia Vikander all put in a valiant effort towards retaining their dignity, but even they couldn't act themselves out of this cinematic quicksand. For all its presumptive wit, the laughter comes more from the fact that so much talent went into making such an obliviously crappy film. It does for historical fiction what The Space Between Us did for YA sci-fi. Mired in production hell for over a decade and delayed release for three years after filming, the film amounts to a laughable period piece with an epic lack of focus. We are witnessing the death knells of the Weinstein Company, and in its darkest hour emerges whatever the hell Tulip Fever is.












Online 2017 film tulip fever